The Mindful Campus: Organizational Structure and Culture
Keywords:Mindfulness, Mindful Campus, Contemplative Education, Tree of Contemplative Practices, Organizational Theory, Organizational Structure, Organizational Culture
AbstractThis case study of a campus known to incorporate contemplative practices in the curriculum and co-curriculum explored how a mindful campus is operated as well as what organizational structures and cultures are in place to support the use of contemplative practices. Supportive structures include physical structures (i.e., a labyrinth and meditation room), non-physical structures (i.e., a faculty learning community and student meditation club), and financial structures (i.e., a special professorate and internal grants). Cultural themes that emerged from participants’ description of the campus culture focused on embodiment of the liberal arts philosophy, community, and connection. All of Tierney’s (2008) aspects of culture—organizational mission, environment, information sharing, socialization of members, strategy, and leadership—had some evidence of being supportive of contemplative education in this campus culture, albeit in varying degrees. However, contemplative education, in itself, does not appear to be adequate to raise consciousness of issues of privilege, social justice, and diversity without making these issues explicit aspects of a mindful campus.
Bach, D. J., & Alexander, J. (2015). Contemplative approaches to reading and writing: Cultivating choice, connectedness, and wholeheartedness in the critical humanities. The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry, 2(1), 17-36. Retrieved from http://journal.contemplativeinquiry.org/index.php/joci/article/view/41
Barbezat, D., & Pingree, A. (2012). Contemplative pedagogy: The special role of teaching and learning centers. In J. E. Groccia & L. Cruz (Eds.). To Improve the Academy, 31, 177-191. Retrieved from http://www.contemplativemind.org/archives/1401
Barlow, K. K. (2016, January 7). Center consolidates mindfulness activities. University Times, 48(9). Retrieved from http://www.utimes.pitt.edu/?p=37780
Berila, B. (2014). Contemplating the effects of oppression: Integrating mindfulness into diversity classrooms. The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry, 1(1). Retrieved from http://journal.contemplativeinquiry.org/index.php/joci/article/view/5
Burggraf, S. (2011). Contemplative higher education: A case study of Naropa University. In Fetzer Institute’s Contemplation nation: How ancient practices are changing the way we live: Papers from the state of contemplative practice in America (pp. 237-245). Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute.
Bush, M. (2011a). Mindfulness in higher education. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 183-197. doi: 10.1080/14639947.2011.564838
Bush, M. (2011b). Contemplative higher education in contemporary life. In M. Bush (Ed.), Contemplation nation: How ancient practices are changing the way we live: Papers from the state of contemplative practice in America (pp. 221-236). Kalamzoo, MI: Fetzer Institute.
Cannon, H. B. (2012, April 10). U.Va. to launch contemplative sciences center. UVA Today. Retrieved from https://news.virginia.edu/content/uva-launch-contemplative-sciences-center
Center for Contemplative Mind in Society. (2015). The tree of contemplative practices. Retrieved from http://www.contemplativemind.org/practices/tree
DuFon, M. A., & Christian, J. (2013). The formation and development of the mindful campus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 134, 65-72. doi: 10.1002/tl.20055
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Goss, R. E. (1999). Buddhist studies at Naropa: Sectarian or academic? In D. R. Williams & C. S. Queen (Eds.) American buddhism: Methods and findings in recent scholarship. London: Curzon.
Kezar, A. J., & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing higher education for collaboration: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Manning, K. (2013). Organization theory in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Sable, D. (2014). Reason in the service of the heart: The impacts of contemplative practices on critical thinking. The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry, 1(1), 1-21. Retrieved from http://journal.contemplativeinquiry.org/index.php/joci/article/view/2
Simmer-Brown, J. (2009). The question is the answer: Naropa University’s contemplative education. Religion & Education, 36(2), 88-101. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2009.10012445
Thurman, R. A. F. (2006). Meditation and education: India, Tibet, and modern America. Teachers College Record, 108 (9), 1765-1774. Retrieved from http://discoverthought.com/Education/References_files/13%20Meditation%20and%20Education%20Thurman.pdf
Tierney, W. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organizational decision-making: Theory and practice in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus. Retrieved from http://wncln.wncln.org/record=b4328745~S2
Wall, J. M. (2014). Finding an inner voice through silence: Mindfulness goes to college. Journal of College and Character, 15(2), 133-140. doi: 10.1515/jcc-2014-0017
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19. doi: 10.2307/2391875
West Chester University. (n.d.). Center for contemplative studies. Retrieved from http://www.wcupa.edu/HealthSciences/ContemplativeStudies/minor.aspx
Wheatley, M. J. (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Retrieved from http://wncln.wncln.org/record=b3650014~S2
Authors who publish with this journal sign a publishing agreement after their paper has been accepted. Through the agreement, authors transfer copyright to CMind, the Center for Contemplative Mind in Society, the publisher of JOCI. Authors may enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., to publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are also permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal and retaining the formatting as published in JOCI.